By Suro Senen 
By Global Tech & Gaming Desk
Published January 2025
Main Facts
In what has quickly become one of the most widely discussed social media exchanges of the year, billionaire tech entrepreneur and X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk found himself on the receiving end of a devastating public rebuke from the official Assassin’s Creed social media team.
The digital confrontation erupted on X, the platform Musk owns, after the billionaire weighed in on a controversy involving Ubisoft’s upcoming title, Assassin’s Creed: Shadows. Musk criticized the publisher’s decision to sponsor prominent leftist Twitch streamer Hasan Piker, labeling Piker a "fraud" and a "sellout" for promoting a "terrible game just for the money."
Rather than letting the insult slide, the official @AssassinsCreed account fired back with a sharp, highly coordinated riposte referencing Musk’s own well-documented gaming scandals. Referencing Musk’s recent humiliation involving Path of Exile 2, the account tweeted: "Is that what the guy playing your Path of Exile 2 account told you?"
The reply went viral almost instantly, racking up over 400,000 likes overnight and triggering a massive wave of schadenfreude, memes, and online commentary. Internet users delighted in the spectacle of a major corporate account completely "cooking" the owner of the platform using his own recent history of alleged "gamer valor theft."
This high-profile public exchange highlights the increasingly precarious intersection of corporate brand marketing, political influencer culture, and the fragile egos of internet-obsessed billionaires who frequently insert themselves into gaming subcultures—only to be exposed by communities that know the spaces inside and out.
Chronology of the Conflict
To fully understand how a routine corporate sponsorship evolved into a massive public humiliation for one of the world’s richest men, it is necessary to trace the timeline of events that led up to the viral exchange.
Phase 1: The Path of Exile 2 "Boosted Account" Scandal (Early January 2025)
Weeks prior to the Assassin’s Creed incident, Musk had been livestreaming his playthrough of Grinding Gear Games’ action role-playing game, Path of Exile 2 (PoE2). Sporting a high-rank character, Musk attempted to present himself to his millions of followers as a hardcore, highly skilled gamer who had legitimately conquered the game’s brutal endgame content.
However, veterans of the Path of Exile community immediately spotted glaring inconsistencies. Observers noted that Musk played the high-rank character with the awkwardness of an absolute beginner, blundering across maps, making fundamental mechanical errors, and failing to understand basic builds.
Furthermore, public game data revealed that Musk’s account was operating out of Asian server regions or via VPNs—an inexplicable anomaly unless someone else had been piloting the character. Under intense community pressure, Musk eventually admitted to "account boosting," famously tweeting, "It’s impossible to beat the players in Asia if you don’t, as they do!" The admission cemented his reputation among hardcore gamers as a "fraud gamer" who preferred paying for prestige over earning it.
Phase 2: The Assassin’s Creed: Shadows Sponsorship Debate
Fast-forward to late January 2025. Ubisoft, the developer behind the highly anticipated and occasionally controversial Assassin’s Creed: Shadows, engaged prominent leftist Twitch streamer Hasan Piker (HasanAbi) to promote the game on his channel.
The partnership immediately drew the ire of right-wing video game commentators, most notably notorious internet critic Mark Kern, widely known online as "Grummz." Grummz took to X to criticize Ubisoft for aligning with Piker, attempting to frame the corporate sponsorship as a political misstep.
Phase 3: Musk Intervenes and Piker Retaliates
Seizing on Grummz’s post, Elon Musk waded into the fray. Abandoning any corporate neutrality, Musk quote-tweeted the criticism and launched a personal attack on Hasan Piker, calling him a "fraud" and a "sell out" for promoting a "terrible game just for the money."
Piker, never one to back down from a public feud, quickly fired back. A flurry of screenshots circulated showing Grummz mediating a bizarre digital standoff between the streamer and the billionaire. Piker openly challenged Musk to a "duel" in FromSoftware’s notoriously difficult action-RPG Elden Ring, while Musk retaliated by calling Piker "chicken-s***" for allegedly blocking him on X.
Phase 4: The Corporate Body Blow
While the war of words between Musk and Piker was already drawing significant attention, it was the intervention of the official @AssassinsCreed account that completely hijacked the narrative.
Deploying surgical precision, the social media manager behind the Assassin’s Creed franchise dropped the reference to Musk’s Path of Exile 2 account-boosting scandal. The tweet instantly "ratioed" Musk—meaning the reply gained significantly more likes and engagement than Musk’s original post—cementing the viral victory for the gaming brand.
Supporting Data and Digital Metrics
The numbers behind the Assassin’s Creed ratio illustrate the sheer scale of the public backlash and the internet’s collective appetite for watching powerful figures get taken down a peg.
- Engagement Velocity: The
@AssassinsCreedreply amassed more than 400,000 likes within its first 12 hours online, vastly outperforming the baseline engagement of both Musk’s attack and Piker’s responses. - Community Amplification: Hundreds of thousands of retweets and quote-tweets flooded the platform, with users resurrecting the phrase, "I was unfamiliar with your game," to praise Ubisoft’s sudden tactical sharpness.
- Economic Irony: Numerous users pointed out the profound irony of Musk spending $44 billion to acquire Twitter/X, only to be systematically humbled on his own infrastructure by a traditional corporate entertainment brand. Some users even vowed to purchase Assassin’s Creed: Shadows at full price specifically to reward the social media team for the roast.
- The "Fraud" Hypocrisy Metric: Gaming forums and subreddit trackers noted a massive spike in discussions concerning Musk’s credibility as a gamer, with data analysts pointing out that attempts by public figures to fake gaming authenticity almost universally result in severe community rejection.
Official Responses and Stakeholder Reactions
The fallout from the exchange drew reactions from all corners of the internet, ranging from amused bystanders to corporate brand strategists analyzing the shift in social media engagement styles.
Ubisoft and the Assassin’s Creed Team
While Ubisoft’s corporate executives usually maintain a sterile, PR-vetted persona on social media, the explosive success of the @AssassinsCreed reply signals a potential pivot toward a more aggressive, internet-savvy tone. By leaning into meme culture and directly targeting the platform’s owner, the brand managed to completely deflect negative talking points surrounding Assassin’s Creed: Shadows and turn the conversation into a widespread celebration of their social media team’s wit.
Hasan Piker and the Creator Community
Hasan Piker capitalized on the drama during his Twitch broadcasts, mocking Musk’s gaming abilities and ridiculing the billionaire’s inability to take criticism while dishing it out freely. Fellow creators and streaming personalities weighed in, highlighting the hypocrisy of a man who bought wins in Path of Exile 2 lecturing others about "selling out" for corporate sponsorships.
The Gaming Community at Large
For months, core gaming subcultures on platforms like Reddit, ResetEra, and X had viewed Musk with suspicion, particularly after his awkward attempts to embed himself in titles like Diablo IV and Path of Exile 2. The consensus among veteran gamers was overwhelmingly supportive of the roast. To the gaming community, Musk represents an invasive tech elite that tries to buy its way into subcultures without respecting the time, effort, and skill required to genuinely master them.
Broader Implications
The viral interaction between Elon Musk and the Assassin’s Creed account is more than just a funny moment of internet history; it carries significant implications for platform ownership, corporate marketing, and the culture of online discourse.
1. The Myth of Platform Immunity
When Elon Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion, many critics worried that the platform would become an unassailable megaphone for his personal views and political crusades. However, this incident proves that algorithmic architecture cannot shield a user—even the owner—from organic social dynamics. When a user loses the cultural argument, the crowd on X retains the capacity to turn even the site’s proprietor into a meme.
2. The Evolution of Corporate Brand Voice
For years, corporate social media accounts attempted to remain entirely inoffensive, relying on bland, focus-grouped statements to avoid alienating any consumer base. The success of the Assassin’s Creed reply points toward a new era of "roast marketing," where brands are increasingly willing to engage in high-risk, high-reward verbal sparring with high-profile individuals. By aligning themselves with internet meme culture, corporate entities can quickly win over cynical digital audiences.
3. Authenticity as Currency in Gaming
The gaming community remains one of the most fiercely protective subcultures on the internet. As demonstrated by both the Path of Exile 2 booster scandal and the subsequent fallout, attempts by outsiders or political commentators to weaponize gaming culture while demonstrating a clear lack of authentic participation will almost always backfire. In the digital arena, clout cannot be bought, and attempts to fake authenticity are met with swift, merciless retribution.
Basiran 
Layla Zulfa 
Raul Delapena Setiawan 